I can get a nice predictable flight path with that disc easily.
COUNTER STRIKE SOURCE HELP DRIVER
Though my my favorite driver (a star TL) is rated at 4. Using those ratings, power 3 seems to be the right spot.
Thank you for posting Joe's flight chart. Nothing higher than a speed 9 should go in the bag. The developing consensus seems to be that discs in the 7-8 speed range would be best. Try either hyzer flipping an under-stable disc up to the 9-10 speed range or using a flex shot Try your current furthest flying discs in a lighter weightģ. Pay attention to the nose angle of your drivesĢ. That said, I think with OAT issues, I would suggest a few things in an attempt to get more distance.ġ. Without fail, destroyers were only getting, if anything at all, 10-20 ft more for us, but usually with really poor accuracy compared to the fairways we were throwing.
COUNTER STRIKE SOURCE HELP DRIVERS
The test I did for myself and also took some friends to do who also were dead set on throwing high speed drivers because they were convinced it gave them more distance was to take my fairways and high-speed drivers out to a ~300 ft hole w/the main goal of testing out distance, while using the basket as an imaginary reference line to assess accuracy. I say that not to be condescending, as I can see the quota for those kinds of responses have already been met, but from experience from some field work. I would be willing to bet that if you took your fairways and took a destroyer, boss, or whatever high speed disc there is and threw them all side by side, that you'll find that any distance gains will either be negligible and/or any distance gained will be offset by loss of accuracy. If you're OATing, in most cases I don't think going up in disc speed will lead to a direct increase in distance. When I was (re)starting out, I was throwing 12-13 speeds, which I had no business throwing. I'll offer my opinion, as I feel like I was in your position pretty recently and had the exact same issues as you. I'm trying to iron those out one at a time. I already have a loooong list of things to work on. (Revelation!) That brings up the question of which ones will or will not work for me.Īnd, yes, I will get around to posting video soon. As I play, I'm going to be throwing discs. But I'm still going to play the game while I'm working on it. As I wrote earlier, I am working on my form. Gosh, we're all really impressed down here, I can tell You. I can not compare with your technique, your timing, your opposing thumbs, your mastery of the reach back, the reach around, and all things reach-related up to but not including the Oakland Raiders draft philosophy. A second-class strong-armer amidst the lords of snap. Please forgive me, an unwashed pleb in the world of disc golf. If you really don't want to learn, I don't think a faster disc is going to help your game. Spell "disc" right is a great place to start. I just don't know if trying to maximize distance with those higher speeds discs is going to cause set backs in my form. I can throw a Valkyrie, a Beast, and a Wraith. As a new player, it' difficult for me to tell when a disc is too fast, or when it's just a matter of me not being familiar with it. If you can throw 300' i would think it would be perfectly ok for you to be throwing speed 9-11 drivers no prob.
When you're not turning and burning them, and getting predictable flights, you'll know you're on your way. Start throwing some understable stuff to help the process. I would say stick to Teebirds until that light bulb goes on. I've been trying to stay away from these discs because, as mentioned, I don't want to disc up too fast. When I do throw it, I get a fairly straight line with a moderate fade at the end. Even though the Roadrunners are exceptionally understable, the heavier of the two rarely flips.
I have a pair of Roadrunners that I rarely throw because I can get similar distance out of my TL and Archangel. Serious reply: People in our club that strong arm (and have no interest in changing methods) typically have the best results with overstable versions of understable discs.
0 kommentar(er)
